Man fights again in opposition to demolition order for second ‘dwelling’ he says is a caravan
A person has been instructed to demolish a property he constructed in his again backyard with out planning permission after failing to persuade the council that it certified as a caravan.
Dr Hayder Ghazi Alwattar submitted a planning utility for what he known as a ‘caravan’ inbuilt his dwelling’s again backyard, however the council deemed it illegal and ordered its removing.
Undeterred, Mr Alwattar has turned to the federal government’s planning inspectors, who possess the authority to overturn the council’s determination.
If the inspectors aspect with Mr Alwattar, it may imply the contentious again backyard construction may be allowed to stay.
Numerous neighbours on the road raised objections, asserting the metal building couldn’t be thought of a ‘caravan’ because it was constructed fully from scratch inside the backyard.
The council’s planners had been additionally unconvinced that it met the authorized definition of a caravan.
One objector acknowledged: “The request states a mobile home or caravan, which implies it is able to be moved, however the residents have built a permanent structure in their garden.
“Not solely does it block different gardens, daylight and privateness, it’s ugly and doesn’t slot in with the aesthetic of the new-build property.”
Earlier this year, Mr Alwattar sought retrospective permission for the ‘mobile home/caravan,’ which included facilities such as a kitchen, shower, and toilet.
However, Worcester City Council’s rejection meant Mr Alwattar faced the prospect of demolishing the home, which he claimed was occupied by a family member.
The local authority then issued him with a notice mandating the demolition of the structure, prompting his appeal.
In his application, Mr Alwattar argued the steel construction, complete with skirting and steps, could be relocated and would always serve as an ancillary structure to the main house, thus qualifying as a ‘caravan.’
Nevertheless, the council’s planners remained unconvinced and maintained it could not be classified as a caravan since there was no evidence to support the claim the structure was movable or towable.
Neighbours provided photographs to the council, showcasing the step-by-step construction of the structure in the back garden. They argued these images served as proof it could never be considered a caravan.
This article was crafted with the help of AI tools, which speed up Express.co.uk ’s editorial analysis. A news editor reviewed this content material earlier than it was revealed. You can report any errors to readercomplaints@reachplc.com.