Reeves: SNP technique not a mandate for independence underneath Labour
A
proposed coverage which might see the SNP search to kick-start independence negotiations if it wins most seats on the subsequent common election has been rejected by Labour’s shadow chancellor.
The movement, proposed by First Minister Humza Yousaf and SNP Westminster chief Stephen Flynn, can be debated on the occasion’s convention subsequent month.
It states that “if the SNP subsequently wins the most seats at the general election in Scotland, the Scottish Government is empowered to begin immediate negotiations with the UK Government to give democratic effect to Scotland becoming an independent country”.
A second referendum on independence has been repeatedly dominated out by successive Conservative prime ministers, and Labour has additionally mentioned it won’t authorise a vote if elected.
Asked in regards to the SNP movement whereas campaigning at Blantyre Fabrications forward of the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election on October 5, Rachel Reeves informed journalists: “No, we wouldn’t consider that a mandate in any way to have another referendum.
“The SNP are now just doubling down on a core vote strategy, not interested in changing the lives of people in Scotland, but focusing narrowly on constitutional issues.
“I don’t think that those are issues that resonate with people here in Rutherglen, or indeed across Scotland.
“This is not the time for a referendum. This is the time to focus on the cost-of-living crisis and sorting out our public services.”
Ms Reeves was joined by Scottish Labour chief Anas Sarwar, MSP Neil Bibby and Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election candidate Michael Shanks.
The Supreme Court has dominated the Scottish Parliament doesn’t have the ability to organise its personal poll on the problem.
Meanwhile, veteran SNP MP Pete Wishart has urged his occasion to maneuver in direction of an independence technique primarily based on a majority of votes as a substitute of seats.
He informed LBC: “I don’t think it’s credible and realistic to try and assert some sort of move towards independence if you’re not carrying the majority of people with you.
“That’s why I really hope that when we get to conference and we’re looking at the best way forward for our independence strategy, that we do move from seats to votes because it’s the only way that I believe we’ll be able to express a view about our independence status, and the only credible way to ensure that we will at least get some sort of hearing by international organisations.”
The First Minister, nevertheless, initially set out a majority of seats technique throughout a particular SNP conference on independence in June.
Mr Yousaf’s technique has been criticised by former first minister and SNP chief Alex Salmond, who now leads the Alba Party, who claimed the strategy will not be credible.
But the First Minister insisted: “I think the question here is what is it that the Westminster parties are so scared of that they won’t give us another referendum.”
Mr Yousaf added that whereas a second referendum remains to be his occasion’s “plan A”, it has been blocked from holding such a vote by Westminster
The First Minister mentioned: “If they are not going to allow us to test our proposition for popular support, I believe we have to use the next electoral means to do that.
“The next election will be a means to test that proposition and the way we will test it is by the rules of a general election. He who wins the most seats wins that general election.”
While he careworn “the party that wins the most seats ends up winning the general election”, he insisted the SNP is “not complacent” as a result of it’s “going to be a really difficult general election”.
Mr Yousaf mentioned: “We know Labour are biting at our heels.
“That is why we will be putting independence front and centre, because my belief is it is absolutely the alternative that people are crying for.
“Labour, Sir Keir Starmer, with his support for the bedroom tax, the rape clause, two-child limit, Brexit. He’s not the alternative, independence is the alternative.”