Banks face Treasury clampdown in Farage account closure row

Jul 19, 2023 at 1:01 PM
Banks face Treasury clampdown in Farage account closure row

Banks shall be pressured to present clients three months’ discover of account closures and to offer a full rationalization of the explanations underneath reforms that could possibly be unveiled within the coming days.

Sky News has learnt that the Treasury plans to drive British lenders to be extra clear with clients amid an escalating freedom of expression row triggered by Coutts’ termination of its relationship with Nigel Farage, the previous UK Independence Party chief.

Sources mentioned the proposals, which might require secondary laws, are more likely to be introduced in written ministerial assertion by Andrew Griffith, financial secretary to the Treasury.

The assertion is predicted imminently, though one supply cautioned that the timetable was but to be signed off by 10 Downing Street.

Insiders mentioned the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) would wish to amend its rulebook to accommodate the modifications, however added that doing so can be neither onerous nor time-consuming.

The requirement for secondary, fairly than main, laws must also shorten the timetable for implementing the modifications, they added.

Bank clients would additionally retain their proper to attraction in opposition to their lender’s resolution to shut an account, with the presumption {that a} mounted discover interval and better transparency in regards to the causes for the financial institution’s resolution would facilitate a more practical attraction.

In restricted circumstances referring to points akin to suspicions of great legal exercise or nationwide safety, banks would nonetheless be allowed to shut accounts with out a full rationalization, sources added.

The situation of unilateral checking account closures has develop into more and more urgent for the reason that monetary disaster as lenders have sought to tighten their compliance with anti-money laundering guidelines, however in latest weeks it has been thrust into the highlight by Mr Farage.

On Tuesday, he disclosed paperwork produced by Coutts – which is a part of the taxpayer-backed financial institution NatWest Group – exhibiting that his accounts had been closed as a result of his views “do not align with our values”.

It had beforehand been advised that Mr Farage had been eliminated as a buyer for monetary causes.

It has additionally emerged that a lot of different senior political figures, together with Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor, have been denied financial institution accounts due to their standing as politically uncovered individuals (PEPs).

The row prompted Mr Hunt to ask Mr Griffith to conduct an pressing overview of the difficulty amid considerations that banks may be disenfranchising clients for ideological causes.

“There is a real concern about the precedent that this could set,” mentioned one insider.

In a submit on Twitter on Wednesday, Mr Griffith mentioned: “It would be of serious concern if financial services were being denied to anyone exercising their right to lawful free speech.

“Businesses have the appropriate to guard in opposition to reputational dangers – eg legal exercise – however the privilege of a banking licence in a democracy ought to indicate an obligation to not ‘debank’ since you disagree with somebody’s views.”

Mr Farage wrote in Wednesday’s Daily Telegraph: “This story is not only about me.

“If this situation is left unchecked, we will sleepwalk towards a China-style social credit system in which only those with the ‘correct’ views are allowed to fully participate in society.”

A Coutts spokesperson mentioned: “Our ability to respond is restricted by our obligations of client confidentiality.

“Decisions to shut accounts are usually not taken calmly and keep in mind a lot of elements together with industrial viability, reputational issues, and authorized and regulatory necessities. As the shopper has beforehand confirmed, various banking preparations have been provided inside the wider group.”

The Treasury declined to remark.