Authorities explores choices to draw pension fund funding for UK tasks

The authorities finds its arms considerably tied at current on measures it could take to spice up financial progress.

The parlous state of public funds – the federal government borrowed £25bn alone in April – signifies that neither significant tax cuts nor will increase in public spending that elevate productiveness are possible simply now.

So it’s no shock to see that, as they seek for different levers to drag, ministers have alighted on the nation’s retirement financial savings.

An estimated £1.4trn resides in non-public sector “defined benefit” (generally referred to as closing wage) pension schemes whereas an extra £1.1trn is estimated to sit down in “defined contribution” (generally referred to as cash buy) schemes.

That is an terrible lot of cash.

Read extra
How the government has been forced to rethink pension policy
Generation of women in debt after ‘absolutely devastating’ state pension fallout

Most of it, although, is invested in locations aside from the UK inventory market – one of many major methods during which cash is channelled to companies that want it to help their enlargement plans.

At the start of the century, UK equities accounted for round half of the cash tied up in UK pension funds, however they now account for beneath 10% of scheme property.

Getting pension funds to speculate extra within the UK

Ministers want to see extra of it invested within the UK.

Some of that might be in UK-listed corporations however the authorities would additionally prefer to see it invested in infrastructure tasks.

The reasoning is that, as infrastructure property take a few years to construct and generate an revenue stream, pension funds are the pure and apparent buyers in some tasks as a result of they’ll afford to take a long-term view.

To an extent, that’s already taking place. Insurers like Legal & General and M&G have been investing extra in infrastructure for a while now, in addition to different associated actions, reminiscent of constructing rental houses.

But the federal government clearly thinks extra needs to be completed.

Tackling UK pension funds perceived as too risk-averse and cautious

To that finish, ministers are reportedly wanting on the pension safety fund (PPF), the lifeboat scheme which protects folks with an outlined profit pension when an employer turns into bancrupt.

The Financial Times (FT) reported on Friday that proposals being thought of by the Treasury would see the PPF’s remit widened so it has a extra lively position in taking up firm pension plans that haven’t failed.

The Treasury doesn’t look like alone in pondering alongside these strains.

The Daily Telegraph studies at present that the Tony Blair Institute will advocate subsequent week that sponsors of the smallest 4,500 outlined profit schemes needs to be allowed the choice of transferring to the PPF.

The thought behind this – extending the PPF’s attain to the pension scheme of corporations which might be alive in addition to useless – is that the fund, which is a public company and answerable to the Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride, might then direct extra money into start-ups and fast-growing companies.

It speaks to the very fact ministers imagine UK pension fund managers are being too risk-averse and too cautious in how they make investments folks’s retirement financial savings.

Ministers imagine that method is holding again the financial system.

As Andrew Griffith, the City minister, instructed the Telegraph at present: “We are working on removing points of friction, streamlining our regulations and encouraging a greater culture of risk-taking.”

A possible profit for savers

Mr Griffith mentioned, in time, this might additionally profit pensions savers.

He went on: “[We have to] move the emphasis away from funds running themselves for the minimum cost to funds looking properly at performance and that is what matters here because it is about making sure long-term savers get the most prosperous retirement that they can.”

Beefing up the PPF’s remit is certainly one of solely various concepts being kicked round.

A Canadian-style thought

Another that has attracted curiosity is Canadian-style “collective defined contribution” schemes.

These schemes, which have additionally been extensively adopted in Denmark, the Netherlands and Australia, goal to supply a mid-point between extra beneficiant outlined profit schemes and the much less beneficiant outlined contribution schemes during which employers and staff pool retirement financial savings right into a fund aimed to supply members with an revenue in retirement.

Unlike an outlined profit scheme, that revenue isn’t assured, however not like an outlined contribution scheme it will additionally search to guard members from the vagaries of market efficiency and the chance {that a} employee may see the worth of their financial savings plunge in a crash shortly earlier than they had been as a consequence of begin accessing them in retirement.

These schemes have been touted as spreading danger between the generations and Royal Mail has set one up for its staff.

Not everyone seems to be satisfied

Not everyone seems to be eager on this concept, although.

John Ralfe, the impartial pensions marketing consultant, has identified the very act of pooling retirement financial savings doesn’t of itself enhance funding returns for retirees – it nonetheless all hangs on how efficiently, or in any other case, that cash is invested.

Another thought being extensively mentioned is the concept of directing pension schemes to position 5% of their property right into a £50bn progress fund that might, for instance, spend money on the UK’s burgeoning tech sector.

It was floated as an thought earlier this yr by Nicholas Lyons, the Lord Mayor of London, who’s at the moment on secondment from the life and pensions company Phoenix Group.

Mr Lyons’s thought has not received common help – Amanda Blanc, the chief government of insurer Aviva, mentioned this week she didn’t assume compulsion was a good suggestion.

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, the commerce physique for these concerned in office pensions, additionally dislikes the concept of compulsion.

Listen and subscribe to the Ian King Business Podcast here

But somebody who does assume it’s price is Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, who instructed the Financial Times (FT) this week she backed the concept.

Ms Reeves mentioned compulsion may not be crucial, given the goodwill within the sector in the direction of investing extra within the UK, however added: “nothing is off the table”.

She instructed the FT, in the identical interview, she additionally favoured consolidation of smaller pension schemes to extra simply construct scale.

The route of journey, then, is obvious. It feels as if extra authorities intervention in how occupational pension schemes are operated and the way they make investments is coming, no matter who wins the subsequent election.