Rishi Sunak’s dangerous transfer: Hiring navy novice Grant Shapps as defence secretary at a time of battle in Europe
The appointment of navy novice Grant Shapps as defence secretary is a dangerous transfer by the prime minister at a time of battle in Europe and main funding challenges for the Armed Forces.
A senior Whitehall supply stated the choice suggests Rishi Sunak favours look over substance – inserting a powerful communicator into one of the crucial essential jobs in authorities as an alternative of a candidate with extra related material expertise.
Other names that had been talked about as doable contenders to replace Ben Wallace included Foreign Office minister Anne-Marie Trevelyan – herself a former defence minister – or safety minister Tom Tugendhat, who beforehand served as a reservist.
Appointment ‘ruffles feathers’ – reshuffle latest
“So depressing,” the supply stated. A second supply added: “Grant’s solid but not a military warrior!”
There will likely be reduction inside the Ministry of Defence that at the least Mr Shapps is an skilled cupboard minister fairly than a extra junior politician.
However, there will even be concern on the arrival of somebody with no prior information of defence, and no time to familiarize yourself together with his new transient.
At the highest of his in-tray would be the UK response to Russia’s battle in Ukraine.
Mr Wallace, a former Army officer, had performed a key position in galvanising worldwide assist to arm the Ukrainian navy.
It is a job that will likely be more and more essential within the coming months as the specter of “war fatigue” grows amongst some Western allies.
Read extra evaluation: Is this an ominous sign of what’s to come?
Another essential space is the necessity to rebuild the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force after a long time of cuts and underfunding.
The Army particularly is in a parlous state having given lots of its ageing weapons – armoured autos, artillery items and ammunition – shares that may want replenishing as a part of a wider modernisation programme that requires robust management.
For the Navy, it has been scuffling with recruitment amid warnings of dire penalties for the flexibility to man ships and even the nuclear deterrent submarines if the variety of folks signing up doesn’t enhance.
As for the RAF, it has been coping with a number of crises over the previous 12 months, together with the revelation of an unlawful recruitment drive that noticed white males unfairly deprived in favour of girls and ethnic minorities.
There have additionally been severe issues with flying coaching which have but to be resolved, and morale among the many service is dismally low.
In addition, the navy is grappling with a multibillion-pound programme to resume its fleet of nuclear-armed submarines concurrently rising a brand new fleet of nuclear-powered boats in a partnership with Australia and the US.
This programme is of strategic nationwide significance and is one thing the defence secretary might want to perceive quick.