England skipper Ben Stokes was caught up in a uncommon incident on the third day of the fourth Ashes Test at Old Trafford. The all-rounder was nearly run out early into the day's play however the vacationers didn't attraction regardless of replays displaying he was wanting his floor.

England have been on the march for extra fast runs after a blistering day two was lit up by Zak Crawley's beautiful 189. Stokes was eager to place stress on the Australia fielders with the forecast trying extraordinarily poor on the weekend in a must-win match for the hosts.

Stokes began the morning on 24 and had already hit a boundary to maneuver onto 31 on the time of the incident. He smashed a Mitchell Starc supply by way of the covers and got here again for 2.

Substitute fielder Michael Neser fielded expertly nicely and fired the ball in at Stokes' finish. A direct hit would have seen the England batter run out by a distance.

A clear assortment from Alex Carey would have additionally seen Stokes dismissed. However, the Australia wicket-keeper dropped the ball earlier than smashing the stumps along with his empty gloves.

Carey signalled to the sq. leg umpire that he had damaged the stumps and due to this fact didn't attraction. But replays proved very attention-grabbing.

Carey did drop the ball however it went straight onto the stumps, with Stokes wanting his floor. He then carried by way of by smashing the stumps along with his gloves.

As there was no attraction, the incident was not referred to the third umpire. But it brought on loads of dialogue among the many Sky Sports commentators.

Former England batter Mark Butcher mentioned: Butcher: "Oh goodness me. The ball hit the stump first and then the gloves. And it looks as if it was the gloves that removed the bails.

"But the ball actually went from glove to stump. But one factor's for positive, if Carey took that cleanly I feel Ben Stokes was gone."

Ex-England skipper Nasser Hussain wondered why the third umpire was not asked. He said: "Yeah that was an attention-grabbing angle that final one, whether or not it was ball dislodging bail or gloves. Difficult to inform.

"I was trying to work out why the third umpire didn't even have a look at it. Maybe that's why, it's very difficult to tell which hits the stumps first."

To which Butcher replied: "You can't find anything if you don't look for it. But there was no decision was there? No decision to go to the third umpire.

"Australia did not actually attraction both. It would have been very attention-grabbing to see what resolution got here out of that.

"A serious point though. How do you decipher whether or not the ball had enough energy to remove the bail, did the bail come out of the groove just before Carey's gloves hit the stump?"

Hussain responded: "Yeah a difficult one but the third umpire should have had a look, assuming there was an appeal. But you're right, there wasn't actually an appeal from Australia."

Butcher concluded that the correct resolution was made. He mentioned: "We've watched it two or three times there and I think you can make the argument that the bail touching middle stump was still in its groove until the glove made contact with the stump. We think it's probably not out."

Third umpire Kumar Dharmasena contacted the commentary field and mentioned Butcher's summation was right. Hussain mentioned: "Just hearing from Kumar Dharmasena about how Butch described that. Perfectly, he said. He got it spot on."