Boris Johnson is backing the COVID inquiry's makes an attempt to see his unredacted messages, after the federal government tried to dam among the releases in a High Court problem.

The former prime minister has informed the courtroom case he has "no objections" to the inquiry seeing his total again catalogue of communications.

On the opposite facet of the controversy is the UK authorities, which needs to have the ability to resolve what messages can and can't be seen by Baroness Heather Hallett, the inquiry's chair.

Politics latest: NHS plan is 'historic and momentous', says Sunak

Their authorized workforce say the inquiry doesn't have the authorized energy to power them to launch the messages and different paperwork, which it says cowl issues "unconnected to the government's handling of COVID".

Lady Hallet has rejected this, saying the Inquiries Act 2005 gives her the power to resolve what's related.

The inquiry has stated it's as much as them to guage which messages have been related.

Lady Hallet says the federal government's angle "undermines" her means to hold out her investigation and would have "serious implications" for all public inquiries.

The dispute is now being settled in the High Court, with proceedings anticipated to conclude on Friday in entrance of Lord Justice Dingemans and Mr Justice Garnha, and a consequence anticipated at a later date.

Sir James Eadie KC, representing the federal government, stated the problem was "brought with some considerable reluctance", however Lady Hallett's demand was "so broad" it was "bound to catch" a considerable amount of irrelevant materials.

Read extra:Government accused of COVID inquiry 'cover-up'COVID inquiry: What is it and what's it trying to find?

This has the potential to incorporate messages from - and about - people who find themselves now in authorities, like Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

Lord David Pannick KC, representing Mr Johnson, stated the previous PM thinks "it is appropriate that the chair has all documents that she reasonably considers are potentially relevant to her ongoing investigation, and that that is consistent with the objectives of the inquiry, which Mr Johnson announced in May 2021."

He added: "First, not only does the [inquiry's] interpretation promote the purpose of the legislation and the inquisitorial nature of public inquiries, it is also consistent with the objectives of this inquiry.

"In establishing the inquiry, Mr Johnson stated in phrases he needed the state's motion to be positioned 'underneath the microscope' and that the inquiry should be 'free to scrutinise each doc'.

"That is what the public expects and that is what should be done."

As properly as Mr Johnson's WhatsApp messages, his diaries and different notes are additionally items of proof the inquiry needs to see.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

The proof needs to be submitted by way of the federal government because it considerations Mr Johnson's time in workplace.

The former prime minister wrote to the inquiry after the Cabinet Office launched the judicial evaluate, saying he was "more than happy" at hand over his unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks on to the inquiry.