In the tip, it was excoriating, damning and unanimous: Boris Johnson was discovered not solely to have intentionally misled the House of Commons over occasions in Number 10 throughout COVID lockdowns, however had attacked the material of our democracy itself by in search of to undermine the committee and investigation.
The conclusion of the 14-month privileges committee inquiry was brutal, as was the advisable sanction: a 90-day suspension from the Commons for "repeated contempt" and revoking his parliamentary move.
It was harder than even a few of Mr Johnson's harshest critics had anticipated, as the unique cost sheet of deceptive the House on a number of events was added to via the investigation - with additional sanctions made for breaching confidence by disclosing the findings of the report and "being complicit in the campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation of the committee".
"The attack on a committee carrying out its remit from the democratically elected House itself amounts to an attack on our democratic institution," stated the report.
What does it change? For his enemies, it proves he's a mistaken 'un, a liar and unfit for prime workplace. They will see this report as the ultimate punctuation mark for his chequered political profession.
Politics Hub: Johnson misled parliament on multiple occasions - latest developments
For his supporters, the extent of sanction is proof of the "overreach" - to cite one ally - of a committee that got down to defenestrate a political powerhouse whom opponents needed to destroy. They argue that the chair ought to have recused herself, and the method was a sham. For them, the die was solid manner earlier than this report was even out.
Is a comeback potential for Johnson?
The largest query - the reply to which can take time to unfold - is whether or not the conclusions of this investigation are so damning that it successfully kills off any hope of a political comeback for the previous prime minister. What is obvious within the early aftermath is that his allies will search to undermine this report so as to maintain the potential for political revival for Mr Johnson alive.
It is equally clear that this report's publication under no circumstances brings an finish to the divisions it has as soon as once more uncovered and exacerbated in a Tory occasion that ploughed via three prime ministers in seven weeks final autumn.
You solely have to have a look at how Mr Johnson and his allies have reacted to each the investigation and the publication of the report right this moment to see Rishi Sunak's fragile peace deal on the benches changing into unstuck.
Penny Mordaunt, the chief of the House, clearly alluded to those tensions within the chamber when she introduced there could be a free vote on the report on Monday.
Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts
She informed colleagues that whereas it was a "painful and sad" course of, they need to learn the report and make their very own judgement. And in a not-so-subtle nod to the tensions, with Tory MPs reeling on the prospect of formally voting to sanction the chief who helped ship them their seats again within the 2019 election, Ms Mordaunt stated this: "All of us must do what we think right, all must leave us alone to do so."
But MPs are usually not being left alone. There is stress from Johnson-backing colleagues and certain additionally their very own Conservative associations about whether or not the occasion ought to condemn Boris Johnson as this cross-party committee has finished.
The not too long ago knighted former minister Sir Simon Clarke - a beneficiary of Johnson's honours checklist - tweeting whilst Ms Mordaunt was on her ft that he was "amazed at the harshness of today's report by the privileges committee. I believed Boris before and I believe him today. This punishment is absolutely extraordinary to the point of sheer vindictiveness, and I will vote against this report on Monday".
Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, one other ally additionally knighted by his outdated buddy Mr Johnson, informed me the 90-day suspension was "extraordinary" and "shows that the report is deliberately trying to do damage to Boris Johnson. It is way beyond a judicial sanction". He too will vote in opposition to the report on Monday, which additionally occurs to be Mr Johnson's 59th birthday.
An unedifying second
It can be an unedifying second for the occasion because the Conservative "Boris haters", as Sir Jacob calls them, line as much as help the privileges committee and one other group of his supporters again the previous PM. He will need to see a present of help - a key factor to observe on Monday is how Conservatives select to vote.
What is obvious from all of this - be it Mr Johnson's assaults on fellow Conservative Sir Bernard Jenkin, who sits on the privileges committee, or the howls of rage from Mr Johnson supporters over his remedy - is that Mr Sunak merely would not have a robust sufficient grip on the occasion to cease the infighting and carry out the reset he wants.
Mr Johnson is likely to be quitting parliament, however the present prime minister nonetheless has two by-elections to struggle due to it earlier than the summer time recess and one later within the 12 months as Nadine Dorries opts to delay her resignation to delay the ache for Mr Sunak.
What about his long-term political profession? Mr Johnson's outdated ally Sir Jacob definitely would not assume the previous prime minister is finished for, telling me that a lot will depend on the judgement folks come to and that there are lots on the market nonetheless within the Johnson camp. He thinks there's a route again for Mr Johnson - though not this aspect of an election.
"I think many people will look at 90 days and will think that that is simply too harsh, too aggressive, and shows what the committee was really trying to do. I think this will generate sympathy for him. But he is still a popular national figure. He still has a connection with voters that most politicians would give their eyeteeth for," says Sir Jacob.
Read extra:Who are the privileges committee investigating whether Boris Johnson misled parliament over partygate?Boris Johnson: What the former PM told the privileges committee about partygate
Jumping earlier than he was pushed, the fury that Mr Johnson unleashed on Friday night time when he introduced he was going to stop as an MP having seen a confidential copy of the report, is now a lot clearer.
The account of his conduct levelled at him by the committee would have nearly definitely resulted in Mr Johnson's suspension from parliament and a potential by-election in his constituency. So, he quits "for now", leaving the chance that he would possibly need to return.
For him, this report was "intended to be the final knife-thrust in a protracted political assassination". Whether it succeeds in killing off his political profession is one other matter. He might need been rejected by parliament, however it is a populist who has constructed his model on with the ability to join with the general public and the grassroots within the Conservative Party. We've had the privileges committee's verdict of the previous PM. We've but to have theirs.
Please share by clicking this button!
Visit our site and see all other available articles!