Boris Johnson has urged his supporters “not to die in a ditch” by voting towards banning him from Parliament.

The Commons is scheduled to vote on whether or not to approve the report into his conduct through the course of the pandemic which discovered that he had repeatedly misled Parliament over whether or not lockdown restrictions have been adhered to.

Mr Johnson stop his Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat final week, launching a blistering assault on the Standards and Privileges Committee, which subsequently printed its findings on Wednesday, branding the findings "deranged".

The report stated the Prime Minister’s behaviour would have merited a three-month ban from the Commons have been he nonetheless an MP.

As it's, Mr Johnson is dealing with a life ban from having a cross for the Palace of Westminster.

READ MORE: 'Incandescent' Boris Johnson eyeing comeback to 'prove enemies wrong'

Allies - notably Nadine Dorries, who has nonetheless not formally resigned as an MP herself regardless of saying she would achieve this “with immediate effect” final weekend - have been regarded as able to dig their heels in by voting towards the report.

However, the looming insurrection is prone to be headed off by the 58-year-old’s intervention, with insiders saying he has informed allies "not to die in a ditch" over the difficulty.

Speaking final night time, backer Sir James Duddridge stated: “I don’t think there’s going to be a vote.

“People just want to move on.”

Current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is prone to miss subsequent week’s vote to host a European chief, in accordance with insiders.

Meanwhile Mr Johnson’s resolution to take a brand new function as a Daily Mail columnist is a "clear breach" of ministerial guidelines.

In his first 1,200-word article, the previous prime minister discusses his unsuccessful private expertise with appetite-suppressants however reaches the conclusion that they might be used to sort out Britain's weight problems disaster.

The publication got here shortly after the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) - the anti-corruption watchdog - wrote to him on Friday demanding a proof after the most recent declare that he has damaged the requirements anticipated of workplace.

Mr Johnson landed the brand new job a day after he turned the primary ever former prime minister to be discovered to have lied to the Commons within the publication of the damning report into his partygate denials.

Acoba, chaired by Tory peer Lord Eric Pickles, was clear that Mr Johnson's last-minute declaration was a breach of the foundations.

A spokeswoman stated: "The ministerial code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice.

"An utility acquired half-hour earlier than an appointment is introduced is a transparent breach.

"We have written to Mr Johnson for an explanation and will publish correspondence in due course, in line with our policy of transparency."

The Acoba guidelines are in place to keep away from suspicion that an appointment may be a reward for previous favours and to mitigate a danger a minister may exploit privileged entry to Government contacts.

But the watchdog is ceaselessly accused of being "toothless" as a result of it can not impose sanctions.

A spokesman for the previous prime minister stated: "Boris Johnson is in touch with Acoba and the normal process is being followed."

Deputy Labour chief Angela Rayner stated Mr Johnson is "once again breaking the rules and taking advantage of a broken system for his own benefit".