Proposals to scrap a goal for sufferers to see a specialist inside two weeks if they're suspected of getting most cancers are being thought-about by NHS England.
Instead, there was a session on the brand new "faster diagnosis standard" which proposes that sufferers who've been urgently referred ought to have most cancers dominated out or obtain a prognosis inside 28 days.
An NHS England spokesperson confirmed on Monday that the proposals have been being checked out.
"These proposals were put forward by leading cancer experts and have the support of cancer charities and clinicians," they mentioned.
"By ensuring extra sufferers are recognized and handled as early as attainable following a referral and changing the outdated two-week wait goal with the sooner prognosis normal already getting used throughout the nation, a whole bunch of sufferers ready to have most cancers dominated out or recognized might obtain this news sooner.
"The changes will also remove the need for unnecessary outpatient appointments in order to comply with waiting times rules, allowing more patients to be referred 'straight to test' and the wider deployment of diagnostic technologies including artificial intelligence."
Professor Mike Osborn, president of Royal College of Pathologists, mentioned whereas he believed "streamlining" the targets was "sensible", "the important thing to realise is that the targets aren't in themselves the outcome - it's the outcome that matters".
"What we really need is a concerted effort, concerted resources to go ahead and overcome the problems, the bottlenecks in cancer care," he mentioned.
Professor Osborn mentioned the "biggest problem" was round workforce.
"If there is just talk and brief resources for a few months, a few years, then we will be back to where we were and that won't overcome the problem," he added.
Health Secretary Steve Barclay informed Sky News no adjustments can be made to most cancers targets until they'd been really helpful by most cancers medical specialists and that every little thing can be achieved in session with main charities.
He confirmed the federal government had held a session and "we'll have something to say in the coming days".
Mr Barclay mentioned what mattered about most cancers targets was "survivability" and that these charges had been enhancing.
"There's a 9% increase in the one-year all-cancer survival rate over the last 15 years," he mentioned. "There's an improvement in the five-year survival rate.
"So what's it that makes probably the most distinction by way of individuals's survival? And what's it that the main medical figures need us to do? And then how are we consulting with the main most cancers charities about any adjustments? That's the work we have been doing."
Asked whether he would be prepared to sign off a potential reduction in the target, the health secretary said: "As I say, we'll have an announcement within the coming days. That's not one thing being introduced right now, however we're in dialogue."
In the session on proposals that started final yr, the NHS mentioned the present two-week wait goal didn't set an expectation of when sufferers ought to obtain take a look at outcomes or have a confirmed prognosis.
Cancer Research UK has additionally mentioned the proposed new targets ought to result in enhancements in prognosis.
But oncologist Pat Price, the top of the Radiotherapy UK charity, mentioned the potential new targets have been "ominous and deeply worrying".
"The performance against the current targets is shockingly bad and has been for many, many months now, deteriorating over years," she mentioned.
"While we agree chasing too many targets can be disruptive and divert resources away from the main patient 62-day treatment target, poor performance is not as a result of how we are measuring it.
"The clear and easy reality is that we aren't investing sufficient in most cancers therapy capability and getting the entire most cancers pathway working."
Under the sooner prognosis normal, sufferers who've been urgently referred, have signs of breast most cancers, or have been picked up by way of screening, ought to have most cancers dominated out or obtain a prognosis inside 28 days.
Those with most cancers ought to then obtain their first therapy inside a month of the choice to deal with after the prognosis, which is called the 31-day choice to therapy normal.
Patients who obtain a most cancers prognosis will begin therapy inside 9 weeks from the date of referral, often known as the 62-day referral to therapy normal.
There are at present 9 most cancers efficiency targets which span three areas, together with the two-week wait between a GP referral and first advisor appointment; a one-month watch for care as soon as a call has been made to supply therapy for most cancers and a two-month wait from the pressing GP referral to a primary therapy of most cancers.
The sooner prognosis normal could have an preliminary efficiency threshold of 75% - that means three quarters of sufferers ought to have a prognosis inside a month.
The proposals come as NHS England figures printed on Thursday confirmed most cancers wait occasions stay under targets set by the federal government and the well being service.
Read extra:'Cancer-killing pill' that appears to 'annihilate' solid tumours is now being tested on humansWomen in certain jobs 'may be at higher risk of ovarian cancer'
In June, 261,006 pressing most cancers referrals have been made by GPs in England, up 6% on 245,595 in May and 13% year-on-year from 231,868 in June final yr.
Some 80.5% of sufferers noticed a specialist inside two weeks - down from 80.8% in May however nonetheless considerably under the goal of 93%, which was final met in May 2020.
Similarly, in Wales, most cancers ready occasions in January hit their worst ranges since new targets have been launched.
Figures from NHS Wales present solely half of individuals began their first therapy in January inside 62 days of most cancers being first suspected.
The Welsh authorities's restoration plan features a restoration goal for most cancers providers to carry the determine from 75% to 80% by 2026.
One affected person, Carol Fletcher, informed Sky News how she waited 21 weeks from present process a routine mammogram to being handled for breast most cancers.
Ms Fletcher, from South Wales, had the mammogram in June 2022 - a screening which she mentioned itself was overdue.
"It took another eight weeks after my mammogram before I was told there might be something wrong," she mentioned.
A biopsy of two lumps adopted. She mentioned it took a fortnight for the checks to return again telling her she had most cancers, whereas it took an extra two weeks to substantiate the second lump was additionally cancerous.
"It took 21 weeks from my mammogram before I had any treatment for this," she mentioned.
"I also had many delays through the course of my cancer treatment - and this is nothing to do with NHS nurses or doctors - it was all to do with the fact it took so long to get through pathology with each of my tests, it added a two-week delay on every time I had a test.
"The delays have been unbelievable," she added.
Please share by clicking this button!
Visit our site and see all other available articles!