Michael Gove has apologised for presidency errors throughout the pandemic, saying the UK was too gradual to enter lockdown in early 2020 after which once more within the autumn when the virus resurged.

However, he defended Boris Johnson towards claims of dithering and dysfunctionality, telling the official COVID inquiry that proscribing folks's freedoms went "deeply against his instincts" and there have been no simple choices to be made on the time.

Asked by lead counsel Hugo Keith KC what the federal government failures have been, Mr Gove mentioned: "I believe that we were too slow to lockdown initially in March (2020). I believe we should have taken stricter measures before we eventually decided to do so in late October."

COVID inquiry live updates

He added that testing ought to have been extra rigorously thought by means of, there was not sufficient give attention to the affect on youngsters and there have been errors with the procurement of non-public protecting tools.

Mr Gove mentioned this was not an exhaustive checklist and the UK was "certainly not well enough prepared" for the unfolding pandemic in March 2020.

The levelling up secretary accepted he "should definitely have been more forthright" in pushing for a lockdown sooner and he took some duty for the "mistakes" made on the high stage of politics

He instructed the inquiry: "If I may... apologise to the victims who endured such pain, the families who endured so much loss as a result of the mistakes that were made by government in response to the pandemic.

"As a minister chargeable for the cupboard workplace, and was additionally near most of the choices that have been made, I have to take my share of duty for that."

Gove warned Cummings 'we'll remorse not taking motion'

Mr Gove's frustration on the time on the dealing with of the pandemic was clear in a sweary WhatsApp message proven to the inquiry to then-chief aide Dominic Cummings on 4 March.

He mentioned: "You know me, I don't often kick off but we're f****** up as a government and missing golden opportunities.

"I will carry on doing what I can but the whole situation is even worse than you think and action needs to be taken or we will regret it for a long time."

Asked to broaden on this, Mr Gove instructed the inquiry he was involved total in regards to the cupboard workplace, for which he had lately taken on duty, together with its potential to take care of COVID.

He mentioned the division was "flawed" and never geared up to take care of a disaster.

But he additionally defended his conduct and that of his colleagues, saying: "I want to stress that I and those with whom I worked were also seeking at every point, in circumstances where every decision was difficult and every course was bad, to make decisions that we felt we could in order to try to deal with an unprecedented virus and a remarkable assault on the institutions of the country."

Lockdown 'towards Boris Johnson's world view'

Despite his long-standing rivalry with Mr Johnson, he additionally defended his foe towards accusations repeatedly levelled throughout the inquiry that the previous prime minister couldn't decide and Number 10 was mired in chaos.

Asked about WhatsApp messages by Cabinet Secretary Simon Case saying working with Mr Johnson's crew was like "taming wild animals", he mentioned that whereas there have been "strong personalities" in Downing Street on the time, "you will always have - it's in the nature of politics - strong views, sometimes punchily expressed".

On Mr Johnson's apparent oscillating over lockdown, he mentioned: "It's not that he found the decision-making difficult, it is that a decision to restrict freedoms in an unprecedented way went against his instincts."

He mentioned the then-PM had a "principled attachment to maximising individual liberty" which meant "restricting free association" was "deeply difficult" and towards his "world view".

'Too a lot requested' of Matt Hancock's division

Mr Gove additionally mentioned he had a "high opinion" of former well being secretary Matt Hancock, who has confronted repeated criticism from plenty of witnesses earlier than the inquiry.

Previous hearings have heard the nation's most senior civil servant on the time, Lord Sedwill, needed Mr Hancock to be sacked, as he displayed "nuclear levels of overconfidence" and had a behavior of claiming issues that weren't true.

But Mr Gove mentioned "too much was asked" of Mr Hancock's Department of Health and Social Care at first of the pandemic and that different elements of presidency ought to have taken on extra.

Read extra:'We look like a joke': Key WhatsApps from inquiryJohnson suggested he thought COVID was 'nature's way of dealing with old people'

The senior MP at one level famous there was a major physique of judgment that believes COVID was "man-made", solely to be instructed by Mr Keith the "divisive" difficulty was not a part of the inquiry's phrases of reference.

Former deputy chief medical officer Professor Dame Jenny Harries will give proof in a while Tuesday.

Later this week, Lady Hallett's probe will even take proof from Mr Hancock and ex-deputy prime minister Dominic Raab.

The inquiry is taking proof as a part of its second module on core UK decision-making and political governance.