Credit Suisse's bailout is a denial of democracy with a "cobbled up" resolution to the banking large's issues rushed over two days, an economist has claimed. The Swiss authorities engineered the takeover of the struggling financial institution by its rival, UBS, leaving buyers with billions in losses.

The unexpectedly organized £2.5billion deal prevented the downfall of Switzerland's second-largest financial institution after its inventory plunged and prospects raced to drag their cash out.

It got here amid fears about long-running troubles at Credit Suisse and wider upheaval within the world monetary system after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank within the US.

An order by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority worn out about £14billion (16 billion Swiss francs) in higher-risk Credit Suisse bonds as a part of the emergency rescue.

Marc Chesney, Professor of Mathematical Finance on the University of Zurich, informed news web site swissinfo.ch that "a DIY solution" was imposed over two days when measures might have been taken as early as 15 years in the past.

In feedback translated from French into English, he mentioned: "This goes against democracy."

Professor Chesney accused governments of turning a blind eye to issues within the system as a substitute of taking steps to stop one other banking disaster.

He mentioned: "We knew since the 2008 financial crisis that the big banks were undercapitalised, opaque, and that they were dealing with huge volumes of derivatives, which are actually gambling in a casino finance system."

Business journalist Myret Zaki blamed shadow banking for the autumn of Switzerland's quantity two financial institution.

She informed the identical publication: "After the 2008 crisis, we imposed rules on banks, but we didn't regulate non-bank finance at all, i.e. transactions that don't appear on the banks' balance sheets."

READ MORE: Dog rescued from England's highest peak after refusing to walk back downhill

Both consultants mentioned the UBS takeover of Credit Suisse will deliver a few financial institution which is simply too large for Switzerland, including the Swiss authorities might have to return to its rescue.

Professor Chesney mentioned: "We are dealing with a behemoth whose balance sheet size will be almost twice Switzerland's GDP, even 40 times bigger if off-balance sheet transactions are taken into account."

UBS introduced earlier this month that the boss of Credit Suisse will be a part of its board after it closes its rescue takeover.

Ulrich Korner, who joined Credit Suisse as Chief Executive Officer final summer season, will be a part of the UBS group govt board.

Bosses at UBS mentioned they anticipate the deal will legally shut within the "next few weeks" to type a merged banking group.

Sergio P. Ermotti, who not too long ago returned to UBS as CEO, mentioned on May 9: "This is a pivotal moment for UBS, Credit Suisse and the entire banking industry.

"Together we'll solidify and signify the Swiss mannequin for finance world wide, one that's capital-light, much less reliant on taking danger and anchored by stability and high-touch service.

"This transaction will allow us to offer attractive returns to our shareholders and give us capacity to further invest and grow.

"The integration of the companies and authorized entities will take time.

"But adding Credit Suisse to UBS's highly capital-accretive business model, diversified revenue streams, disciplined risk management and balance sheet for all seasons will benefit our clients, employees, investors, the economies we serve and the wider financial system."

Professor Chesney referred to as on Swiss politicians to take motion to assist forestall one other banking disaster.

He mentioned: "We know what needs to be done: increase the equity of banks; separate corporate banking from retail banking; introduce a micro-tax on transactions and, of course, reduce the salaries of big bank executives."

The professional mentioned if Credit Suisse's collapse doesn't have any penalties, then banks will stick with it taking dangers.

He defined: "The big banks know that the taxpayer will foot the bill and that the political world is turning a blind eye. So there's no reason for them to change their behaviour."

Additional reporting by Maria Ortega.