A dad who suffered a mind damage simply days after receiving a British-developed COVID vaccine has informed Sky News he would by no means have had the jab if he had recognized of the danger of uncommon however critical unintended effects.

Jamie Scott, who has two younger boys and is now unable to work, is suing AstraZeneca for what he says is harm attributable to the jab in April 2021.

He alleges the pharmaceutical large exaggerated the vaccine's effectiveness and downplayed its dangers.

AstraZeneca denies the claims made towards them.

In his first TV interview, Mr Scott informed Sky News: "I took it to guard the aged folks round me.

"AstraZeneca and the government need to explain the risk whenever you take medicine. If there's a risk - I've got a young family - I would never have taken it."

Ten days after having his first dose of the vaccine, Mr Scott wakened with a extreme headache, began vomiting and had hassle talking.

He was taken to hospital the place he was recognized with a clot that was stopping blood draining from his mind, in addition to a haemorrhage within the mind itself.

He had surgical procedure and was in a coma for simply over a month. His spouse Kate was informed that if he survived he would by no means be the identical once more.

Mr Scott now has a poor reminiscence, has hassle studying, writing, listening and talking, is partially blind in each eyes and suffers from ache and fatigue.

He says he cannot drive or play an energetic half in his boys' lives.

"Everything about me has changed. Everything is difficult," he stated.

"I am happy to be alive. But I'm a shadow of what I was and every day is difficult."

There are 51 circumstances lodged with the High Court with folks claiming harm because of vaccination. Some are bereaved family.

Mr Scott was given a payout of £120,000 from the federal government's Vaccine Damage Payment (VDP) scheme.

But that comes nowhere close to to changing the profession earnings he would have acquired as an IT skilled.

"If Jamie was in a car crash there would have been insurance to cover the injuries and loss of income," stated Mrs Scott.

"We should not have to lose our house, or not be able to afford to fix our cooker when it breaks down or not be able to take the kids on holiday.

"If VDP was reformed, we'd not must litigate."

To be given the full £120,000 payout from the vaccine damage scheme claimants have to be assessed as at least 60% disabled. Those with a lower degree of disability - which can still be life-changing - don't qualify.

The AstraZeneca vaccine was developed by scientists at the University of Oxford. It went through accelerated testing and licensing because of the urgency of the pandemic and was authorised for emergency supply in December 2020.

The authorities and plenty of docs assured the general public that the vaccine was protected and urged folks to take the jab.

But within the spring of 2021, there have been experiences round Europe of individuals struggling uncommon blood clotting a number of days after vaccination.

Sarah Moore, a lawyer at Leigh Day Solicitors who's representing Mr Scott and the opposite claimants, informed Sky News: "As early as the beginning of March in 2021, other European countries had withdrawn or suspended this product from the market because they had seen this problem.

"Our argument is that on the date upon which Jamie's vaccine was utilized, there was no warning.

"Now, if you are going to take a healthy person and give them any medical product, then generally most people would accept that has to be a warning within the product literature that specifies that risk, particularly when we're talking about the gravity of risk in this context."

Keep up with all the newest news from the UK and world wide by following Sky News

Tap here

AstraZeneca says it up to date product info for the vaccine in April 2021 to replicate the likelihood in very uncommon circumstances that it could possibly be a set off for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

In a press release, it stated: "Our sympathy goes out to anyone who has lost loved ones or reported health problems. Patient safety is our highest priority and regulatory authorities have clear and stringent standards to ensure the safe use of all medicines, including vaccines.

"From the physique of proof in medical trials and real-world information, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has repeatedly been proven to have an appropriate security profile and regulators world wide persistently state that the advantages of vaccination outweigh the dangers of extraordinarily uncommon potential unintended effects."

Read extra from Sky News:Man admits killing mobility scooter rider Humza Yousaf resigns as Scotland's first minister

This will not be anti-vax – it is about being trustworthy about medicines

There's no query that what occurred to Jamie Scott is an utter tragedy.

He had an incredible profession, two boys and a loving spouse. And when his invitation got here for the COVID jab he seized the prospect to guard his aged family and do his bit to deliver the pandemic to an finish.

But that was the day that his life was up-ended, struggling what his legal professionals say was a catastrophic response to the AstraZeneca vaccine.

He has been unable to work since, and doubtless by no means will. His spouse Kate has given up her job to be his carer.

The Scotts argue that had he been in a automotive accident the insurers would have settled on a sum that mirrored his possible profession earnings and the quantity of care he wanted.

But he has been given simply £120,000 from the federal government's vaccine harm fee scheme. That's the utmost payout.

It is a paltry sum if you find yourself 44 - as he was on the time - with no different supply of earnings and many years of life forward of you.

Read Thomas Moore's full analysis here

The Department of Health and Social Care stated it does not touch upon ongoing litigation or particular circumstances.

It added that the AstraZeneca jab hasn't been used within the UK because the begin of the booster programme within the autumn of 2021 as a result of different mRNA vaccines had been proven to be more practical.

However, the vaccine has been extensively used world wide. In the primary 12 months of use, greater than two billion doses got, saving an estimated six million lives.

At the time of the rollout - and since - there was a vocal minority of people that campaigned towards COVID vaccines.

But Mr and Mrs Scott say they don't seem to be anti-vaxxers.

Mrs Scott stated: "I would say we are vaccine-hesitant now because if it goes wrong you are left out in the cold.

"There needs to be safety for these individuals who did the precise factor when the federal government stated it was protected and efficient, time and time once more.

"Even now if you try and question that narrative you're shut down and told that's anti-vax - and it just can't be."