As a part of a brand new revenue-distribution mannequin, India are set to take house 38.5% of the $600m earnings over the subsequent four-year business cycle. The ECB are the subsequent highest earners within the proposed mannequin, doubtlessly incomes $41.33 million (6.89%) with Cricket Australia subsequent highest with $37.53 million (6.25%).

The PCB is projected to make over $34.51 million (5.75%) leaving the remaining eight Full Members with beneath 5% of the earnings. Of the $600 million projected pool, the 12 Full Members will get $532.84 million (88.81%), with the remaining $67.16 million (11.19%) going to the Associate Members.

"I get it (the monetary inequality). But I additionally perceive how vital India is, as a result of with out them we would not have the type of revenues which might be coming into the sport."

Richard Gould

"What I'm additionally fascinated by is India's dedication additionally to help the world sport. You have a look at the chances and go 'Well, that is not honest it ought to be break up equally'. But we have to have a look at the dimensions of the market. India play as many worldwide fixtures as another group on the planet. And they try this as a result of they know once they tour as a world group, they carry curiosity and income to that house facet. I feel it is vital to see issues within the spherical, in that regard.

"I get it (the financial inequality). But I also understand how important India is, because without them we wouldn't have the kind of revenues that are coming into the game. And I do think India make huge efforts to be responsible partners in this when I see the amount they travel around the world, taking India everywhere. I do think it is a balance.

"I feel there's collective decision-making, each in India and inside the ICC, and I feel there's a actual dedication and understanding we want [for] cricket to be increasing and we want it to be wholesome world wide."

Gould suggested that the money could be better shared around the game if boards pay touring sides, a shift from the current situation where host boards retain all revenue generated. Over the last few years, that situation has served to highlight inequalities throughout the game's various markets, particularly when it comes to Test cricket.

Full members like West Indies, South Africa and New Zealand are in the process of backtracking from red-ball cricket given the costs incurred to host Tests are not worthwhile as far as their own domestic deals are concerned, particularly at the expense of limited-overs fixtures. Gould sees no reason why that should be the case and feels countries like England, where Test cricket thrives, must do more.

"When someone excursions England, we do not pay them a charge, we do not pay their gamers," Gould said. "The means that it is executed in bilateral cricket in the meanwhile is you keep your individual house home revenues. And once you journey away, they obtained their home income. That's the place the disparity of markets is available in. That's one thing we'll wish to and might want to have a look at when it comes to encouraging individuals not simply to play Test however ensure they'll pay their gamers, and pay them effectively, in order that they wish to play Test cricket once more."

More cricket being played around the world a 'good thing'

On the subject of franchise cricket, the former Surrey chief executive regards the increase in T20 competitions around the world as an example of cricket's growth. Moreover, he is of the belief the upcoming Major League T20 in the United States can help the game reach new, high-yield markets.

"You have a look at the T20 franchises and all these leagues which might be being created - there's extra cricket being performed world wide now than there ever has been earlier than. That has received to be a very good factor.

"And then there are mother markets in play. The States is an interesting market. What happens if we get cricket in the Olympics, which is in the States (Los Angeles, 2028)? There's another key, pivotal moment for it. There will be some bumpy patches along the way in terms of what direction we take, but never mind that. Let's look at the overall big picture - the game is growing."

"We are not going to take the Hundred out. We are going to make it bigger and better"•Getty Images

"You could argue it gives us a point of difference, in a very crowded market," he mentioned. "It is a degree of distinction.

"You see the competitors that we're in globally now. Every nation must have a brilliant, primetime white ball home comp. We have invested very closely within the Hundred over numerous years, each emotionally and financially. We have to make it larger and higher. We even have the Blast which we have to amplify and higher.

"We are not going to take the Hundred out. We are going to make it bigger and better. We are going to make the whole of cricket, bigger and better. That is our aim. We want to do it in a really collaborative fashion where everyone feels they have a role, they have purpose and they have something to gain from this.

"The format isn't one thing that's on my agenda, on this regard, as a result of Sky have been actually supportive in driving it ahead. It's given us that time of distinction. Everybody world wide, within the cricketing world, has heard of the Hundred. That's a very good factor. That's a very good factor - we like debate. When you have a look at sport, greater than 50% of the protection that we get is in regards to the politics and the machinations of the game fairly than the game itself. That's a very good factor too - so long as persons are speaking in regards to the sport, I'm fairly joyful."

Vithushan Ehantharajah is an affiliate editor at ESPNcricinfo