igel Farage has not denied a report that he isn’t rich sufficient to carry an account at personal financial institution Coutts.

The Brexit chief fell under the monetary threshold wanted to carry a Coutts account, and was supplied a typical account at NatWest as an alternative, the BBC reported on Tuesday.

The report comes after the previous chief of the UK Independence Party (Ukip) claimed his account was refused as a consequence of political causes.

In response to the report that he didn't meet Coutts’ monetary threshold, Mr Farage stated: “They’ve never mentioned that before, in the previous ten years.

“Coutts are frankly, being very, very dishonest indeed.”

Read More

Coutts requires its prospects to borrow or make investments at the very least £1 million or save at the very least £3 million with the personal financial institution, in accordance with an eligibility questionnaire on its web site.

But Mr Farage, who's now a presenter on the GB News channel, stated “at no point in the last 10 years” did the financial institution give him a minimal threshold, and that he now has “more money sitting on a current account” than earlier than.

He confirmed he was supplied a typical account with NatWest, which owns Coutts, however solely after talking publicly concerning the situation final Thursday.

Mr Farage stated in a video posted on Twitter: “They are telling the press I don’t meet their wealth threshold.

“Well, they never mentioned that before in the previous 10 years. The worst of the story is, they denied to me on the phone on Friday I was a PEP (Politically Exposed Person).”

He stated that 9 different banks have refused him on the premise of being handled as a PEP.

This refers to somebody who holds excessive public workplace within the UK or abroad, or their members of the family, that means monetary establishments can deal with their accounts with further due diligence.

PEPs may pose extra of a threat of abusing their public workplace place for private achieve, akin to by making or accepting bribes, in accordance with steerage by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

The Government is trying into whether or not banks are closing individuals’s accounts over their political beliefs, sparking disputes over whether or not freedom of speech is being “denied” by monetary providers corporations.

The Treasury stated it was already trying into whether or not banks and regulators had been being too rigorous in how they deal with PEPs, and ensuring that UK-based politicians had been being handled as much less dangerous people than these in different international locations.

A Treasury spokesman stated: “It would be a serious concern if financial services were being denied to those exercising the right to lawful free speech.

“We are already looking into this issue and have passed a law that requires the FCA to review how banks treat politically exposed persons – so we can strike the right balance between the customer’s right to free speech and the bank’s right to manage commercial risk.”

It has requested the FCA to conduct a evaluate into whether or not monetary establishments are assembly its steerage over the therapy of PEPs, and whether or not that steerage must be up to date.

The official spokesman for the Prime Minister stated he was “concerned” by a number of the reviews, including: “Free speech within the law and the legitimate expression of differing views is an important part of British liberty.”

He careworn that the Treasury is working a name for proof to evaluate whether or not the present system is truthful.

Coutts declined to remark.