Greta Thunberg has joined a protest exterior the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero to demand the Government stops the most important undeveloped oil discipline within the North Sea. It comes a Swedish court docket fined the local weather activist for disobeying police at an environmental protest at an oil facility in June. She was fined 2,500 kronor (about £185).

In a press release, Ms Thunberg stated: "How can the British government even consider pressing ahead with new drilling when we can see what the burning of fossil fuels is doing to the climate and to people?

"The excessive climate occasions being skilled world wide proper now's only a style of what is to come back if we do not get off fossil fuels.

"Given everything that we know and can now see with our own eyes, approving Rosebank would be a deliberately destructive act."

Ms Thunberg additionally took purpose on the Norwegian authorities as the most important shareholder of the oilfield’s operator, Equinor.

She stated: "Norway’s claim to be a climate leader is absurd while Equinor plans to open up new oil and gas projects, like Rosebank, around the world."

Charges have been previoulsy introduced in opposition to Ms Thunberg and different activists from the Reclaim the Future motion for refusing a police order to disperse after blocking entry to an oil terminal within the Swedish metropolis of Malmö on June 19.

Despite the advantageous, Ms Thunberg and Reclaim the Future protesters returned to the terminal to stage to a different roadblock till they have been finally eliminated by police.

Ms Thunberg, 20, admitted to the info, however denied guilt, arguing the combat in opposition to the fossil gasoline trade was a type of self-defence as a result of existential and world menace of the local weather disaster.

After listening to the decision she vowed to not again down, telling reporters: "We cannot save the world by playing by the rules."

Activisit Tori Tsui from the CeaseRosebank marketing campaign group, talking alongside Thunberg at Friday's protest, stated: "The damage we are seeing today is so immense that it is unthinkable any government would want to send us further down this path.

"Rich, oil producing international locations, just like the UK and Norway, should lead and that management begins with placing an finish to new oil and fuel developments. There isn't any justification on earth for approving Rosebank."

Lauren MacDonald, from the group, added: "There is nothing 'proportionate and pragmatic' about opening up new oil fields, to make use of Rishi Sunak’s phrases. It’s an excessive place within the context of the local weather disaster.

"When you add to this that Rosebank won’t lower UK fuel bills, as it’s mostly oil for export, and the fact the public is effectively stumping up 90 percent of the costs of developing the field because of the huge subsidies the industry gets, Rosebank makes zero sense."

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has been approached for remark.