Since Boris Johnson pulled the proverbial hand grenade pin in an try to blow up the Conservative Party along with his resignation from Parliament final Friday, it has been laborious for the political institution to give attention to little else.

Not that there was an terrible lot of competitors with one more topic debate within the Commons right now, this time led by the SNP, which once more lowered Parliament to a 48-hour distraction this week for many MPs who took an early prepare residence.

But simply because the Privileges Committee lastly appears to have labored out how and when it'll publish its report into Boris Johnson allegedly intentionally mendacity to Parliament, the difficulty exploded once more.

Just if you although we had topped out on intrigue, the allegations round Tory grandee (and Brexiteer) Sir Bernard Jenkin have now fed right into a narrative the previous Prime Minister was arrange by a "kangaroo court."

It has been claimed that Sir Bernard attended a lockdown-breaking social gathering for the sixty fifth birthday of his spouse, Baroness Anne Jenkin,  through the pandemic organised by Deputy speaker Eleanor Laing.

READ MORE: Boris demands Tory MP quits 'kangaroo court' just hours before release of report

A former senior minister and Boris Johnson ally had little doubt concerning the significance of the Jenkin story.

It comes because the Privileges Committee appeared to substantiate it intends to pursue MPs who repeated the "kangaroo court" allegation uttered by the now former MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip.

The former minister stated: "Well this puts Rishi [Sunak] into a bit of a bind.

"He will now need to withdraw the whip from Bernard and power him to resign as properly.

"If Boris and others are guilty of contempt of Parliament, so is Bernard. He has not declared an interest which he should have done if he broke lockdown rules and he has not been honest about his own activities."

The Johnson ally continued: "This whole saga proves that there was collusion between the committee and Downing Street to get Boris."

It has additionally been claimed that of all of the MPs on the committee it was Sir Bernard who was pushing for the harshest sanctions.

"Utter hypocrite!" blasted one other MP.

Such has been the hypothesis and fervour round this topic that every one types of claims and counter claims have been exchanged on varied Tory Whatsapp teams relating to the committee.

Sir Bernard had been a key a part of the inquiry as he was a founding father of Vote Leave and tried to recruit Boris Johnson as its figurehead in 2016.

A longstanding Tory MP and Johnson ally claimed "Bernard Jenkin is just bitter because he was never given ministerial preferment."

There are different accusations flying round.

It has been claimed by some Conservative MPs that their social gathering colleagues on the committee had agreed to droop Johnson for 5 days.

Crucially, that is below the edge of 10 days which permits a by-election to be triggered.

But the accusation is that the Labour chair Harriet Harman "gamed" the Tory members by refusing to publish the report whereas the bulk solely needed 5 days.

It is then claimed that when civil servants within the Cabinet Committee kicked off about Whatsapp messages from the previous Prime Minister then a 3rd strand of the investigation was opened.

At that time Conservative MPs on the committee, it's claimed, agreed to the going past 10 days after which Ms Harman agreed to publication though, it's alleged, that Mr Johnson didn't have a correct likelihood to answer.

The Commons authorities have been dismissive of the claims.

A spokesman stated: "Every single assertion here is untrue.”

The discussion though is illustrative of the frenetic nature of speculation over what is happening.

Neither is Sir Bernard the only target of gossip on the committee.

It has been claimed that Andy Carter, the MP for Warrington South, had been promised a much safer newly created seat of Chester South and Eddisbury as part of the pressure supposedly put on him to come to the right decision about Mr Johnson.

An amiable and decent character, this seems to be one of the wilder bits of speculation but many of his colleagues are now looking at where he stands at the next election.

Mr Carter, who has been under immense pressure from all sides in this process, told Express.co.uk: "If they had been making an attempt to type a secure seat for me, I want they'd inform me."

It feels with the report lastly anticipated tomorrow the hypothesis is not going to finish.

Nor will it end Boris Johnson - those that suppose he's responsible at all times did and those that suppose he's a sufferer of witch hunt at all times have.