he disclosure of an e-mail to Ryan Tubridy’s agent has undermined makes an attempt by senior RTE executives to distances themselves from the funds controversy, parliamentarians have been instructed.

Agent Noel Kelly described the e-mail to him from former RTE chief monetary officer Breda O’Keeffe as a “shocking revelation” that instantly contradicted the declare that ex-director basic Dee Forbes had carried out a “solo run” by agreeing to underwrite a 75,000-euro-a-year deal involving RTE, Tubridy and Renault.

The disclosure was one among a number of made by Mr Kelly and Tubridy on Tuesday as they sought to problem RTE claims across the 345,000 euro of misreported funds to the presenter.

They additionally rejected the suggestion that 120,000 of that whole represented further funds to Tubridy throughout the years 2017-19.

Tubridy and his agent as an alternative contended that RTE incorrectly under-reported the agreed wage paid to the star throughout these years by a complete of 120,000 as a strategy to “set off” a 120,000 euro loyalty cost that the presenter was due on the finish of his contract, however didn't finally declare for.

Read More

“There have been no overpayments of any sort,” mentioned Tubridy.

He mentioned all the problems associated to the misreporting of funds to him have been right down to RTE’s “unfortunate accountancy errors”.

One of probably the most contentious points of the furore on the nationwide broadcaster includes a tripartite settlement between RTE, Renault and Tubridy in 2020 that noticed the star paid 75,000 euro a 12 months in trade for private appearances for the motoring firm.

In the primary 12 months, Renault paid the 75,000 euro to Tubridy – albeit it acquired a 75,000 euro credit score off its sponsorship association with RTE in consequence.

More controversial was RTE’s determination to underwrite the settlement, which means when Renault pulled out after the primary 12 months, the general public service broadcaster picked up the tab for 2 75,000 euro funds for 2021 and 2022.

The broadcaster additionally used a UK-based industrial “barter account” to make these two funds.

Last week Ms O’Keeffe instructed parliamentarians that when she left her function in March 2020, RTE’s place was that it will not underwrite the deal as a consequence of dangers concerned.

“My recollection is that Mr Tubridy’s agent requested that the commercial agreement be underwritten by RTE and this was refused,” she mentioned.

She added: “I was not aware any guarantee had been issued until I heard about it last week in the media reports.”

On Tuesday, Mr Kelly revealed an e-mail despatched by Ms O’Keeffe in February 2020, cc’ing Ms Forbes and director of content material Jim Jennings, that knowledgeable the agent of RTE’s willingness to “provide you with a side letter to underwrite this fee for the duration of the contract”.

Mr Kelly mentioned the e-mail instantly contradicted Ms O’Keeffe’s personal claims final week, and the additional assertions of others in RTE round who was liable for the underwriting.

“This is perhaps the most shocking revelation this morning,” Mr Kelly mentioned.

“Since this controversy began, RTE has tried to distance themselves from this decision.

“Effectively they have blamed former director-general Dee Forbes for doing a solo run and for giving a verbal commitment to underwrite the contract on a Zoom call in May.”

Tubridy and Mr Kelly mentioned they weren't conscious chat present sponsor Renault had withdrawn from the tripartite settlement after 12 months one.

In response to questions from Fianna Fail TD Paul McAuliffe, Mr Kelly mentioned “No, no idea”.

Mr Kelly was additionally requested why he had used the outline “consultancy fees” on the invoices he raised for the 75,000 euro funds for 2021 and 2022 and never put Tubridy’s identify on them.

He mentioned he was following directions from RTE and rejected any suggestion he colluded with the broadcaster to hide the true nature of the funds.

“I think the lack of credibility is on RTE’s side,” he mentioned.

Mr Kelly was challenged why he had not queried why the primary bill was paid by Renault however the second two by Astus, the UK firm linked to the RTE barter account.

“We acted at all times on instructions from RTE,” he defined.

He added: “We trusted the process, why would we not trust the process?”

Mr Kelly has mentioned it was the thought of RTE’s former industrial director Geraldine O’Leary to label invoices for funds as a consequence of Tubridy as “consultancy fees”.

The agent additionally rejected the suggestion that the cope with Renault was designed to compensate for the pay discount Tubridy had signed as much as along with his new RTE broadcasting contract – a reduce that amounted to 525,000 euro throughout 5 years.

“This was a separate contract for separate services,” he mentioned.

Pressed on why he had sought the broadcaster to underwrite the annual 75,000 euro funds, Mr Kelly mentioned the dedication was requested to make sure the association would proceed if the sponsor modified.

“I asked for the deal to be underwritten because the relationship with the sponsor is with RTE, it’s not with us,” he mentioned.

Tubridy and Mr Kelly claimed they each thought the invoices that have been paid from the UK-based barter account in 2022 have been really paid by Renault, given the primary of the three invoices had been paid by the motoring firm.

“That’s the misunderstanding,” mentioned Mr Kelly.

On Tuesday, RTE rejected the declare that it gave an “incorrect version of events” to the Oireachtas over its settlement to underwrite funds.

The broadcaster mentioned: “For clarity, the claim relates specifically to an email that was sent by the former CFO of RTE to NK Management (Noel Kelly’s company) on February 20 2020, which is being characterised as a contractual commitment on the part of RTE to underwrite the payments in question.

“RTE does not accept this characterisation.

“RTE’s position is that the email of February 20 2020 formed part of the discussions and engagement between it and NK Management in relation to the proposed new TV and radio contract with Mr Tubridy/Tuttle Productions and did not comprise a binding legal or contractual commitment on its part.

“RTE’s position is as per previous statements: That, until the verbal commitment given by the former director-general during the call on May 7 2020, it had not agreed to underwrite the 75,000 euro payment per contract year.”

During the Public Accounts Committee on Tuesday morning, Tubridy answered at size on the 120,000 euro of misreported funds between 2017 and 2019.

The star mentioned RTE had cited “accountancy reasons” as an evidence as to why they have been proposing to retrospectively underreport Tubridy’s precise wage throughout these years to offset the 120,000 end-of-contract cost that the presenter didn't take up.

“And we said that this didn’t make any sense as we had neither invoiced, or received or refunded the 120. So how could it be deducted?” mentioned Tubridy.

He steered the strategy was “kind of mad”.

“RTE’s proposed treatment of this would give the impression that I was being paid 120,000 euro less than I was actually paid.

“We made clear that the 120,000 should not be taken off or deducted for prior year actual earnings.”

He claimed RTE initially agreed with this argument however then latterly reverted to its authentic strategy when it printed the figures for RTE’s prime 10 earners – figures that under-reported Tubridy’s wage by a complete of 120,000 throughout three years.

“We were obviously very surprised to see that,” mentioned Tubridy.