Ravi Shastri, the previous India coach, is "glad" the selectors have valued Ajinkya Rahane's expertise in selecting him for the WTC ultimate towards Australia at The Oval from June 7-11. He underlined Rahane's want to play first-class cricket and the runs he made there as one of many key differentiators.

Rahane captained Mumbai through the 2022-23 Ranji Trophy, the place they narrowly missed qualifying for the knockouts. He made 634 runs in 11 innings at a median of 57.64, together with two centuries.

"I'm so glad he's made it to the side," Shastri informed ESPNcricinfo on the Ravi & Raunak Show. "He batted beautifully in these two-three games he's played in the IPL, has looked in great touch. And let's not forget the experience he has. The moment Shreyas Iyer was injured, you had to look in that direction."

"People think he's just played three IPL games and that's why he's in the side. They must have been on holiday for six months when he was playing first-class cricket. They must've been somewhere in the jungle where there's no contact with anyone in the world. When you go six months into a holiday, you miss those 600 runs."

Since being unnoticed, Rahane battled a wrist harm that restricted his IPL participation final 12 months. Once he returned, he touched upon enjoying with freedom and with out worrying a couple of comeback. Shastri in contrast Rahane's comeback to Cheteshwar Pujara's.

Pujara too discovered himself out together with Rahane after the South Africa tour final 12 months, however prolific returns in county cricket fueled his return. He made eight a whole lot - together with three doubles - for Sussex throughout codecs, final 12 months.

"Absolutely, it's a one-off big game, like the Super Bowl, and you need your experienced player," Shastri mentioned of Rahane's inclusion. "Don't forget just two-and-a-half years ago, the man won a Test series in Australia. He was the captain when Virat [Kohli] went [on paternity leave] and did a sterling job.

"People overlook that hundred on the MCG, the way in which he performed, and the truth that he is gone again to the grind. You noticed what it did with Pujara, he went again to the grind enjoying home cricket, enjoying county cricket, simply obtained the variety of runs beneath his belt, then got here again into Test cricket and carried out. It's the identical factor with Rahane, let's hope that have comes helpful."

Shastri didn't mince words when asked if chatter around Rahane's good form and his ball-striking may have been a factor in his eventual selection. "Oh, loads, as a result of the reminiscence is recent," he responded. "Domestic cricket was over two months in the past. People would possibly are inclined to overlook it, even the selectors. Suddenly you are available in and play that type of innings the place you take a look at ease, the timing is sweet, the footwork is sweet, the arrogance is sweet, it will've positively helped."

"People assume Rahane simply performed three IPL video games and that is why he is within the aspect. They will need to have been on vacation for six months when he was enjoying first-class cricket"•Getty Images

'Wasn't invited to a single selection meeting'

Shastri also opened up about his seven-year tenure with the Indian team across two stints between 2014-2021, first as team director and then as head coach. His last assignment was the T20 World Cup in 2021, before Rahul Dravid took over in November 2021.

Shastri categorically stated not having sat in a single selection meeting in this period, while also elaborating on why a coach needed to be there even if it wasn't in a voting capacity.

"I've zero first-hand expertise [of attending selection meetings]," he said. "Seven years I used to be a part of the staff, I by no means went close to a variety assembly. I wasn't invited both. I believe in the long term, sure [a coach should be invited].

"You spend a lot of time with the boys, it's important, even if not in voting capacity, but to hear what the selectors are thinking, what is their train of thoughts are. And then to decide what could be the right thing for the side. I have zero idea how it starts, how it finishes, who are there in the meeting. From what I gather, there were a lot of people [in the meetings], over the last three-four years, inside selection meetings, not supposed to be there, against the constitution but pitched up."

However, Shastri did acknowledge that he had reservations attending such conferences for the potential of gamers not opening as much as him in the event that they knew he had a say in choice.

"I needed the trust of the player," Shastri defined. "if a player knew I was a selector or I could influence a selector/chairman of the committee, then will he open up to me? Will he have the same trust in me? There could be a certain people who will come and still be open and upfront, there could be a certain people who might not want to, and I don't blame them because they may have some reservations.

"From my standpoint, that is why I believed it is best to remain away, however in the long term, particularly when a staff is within the rebuilding stage, it is extraordinarily essential {that a} coach who spends loads of time with the gamers inside the confines of the dressing room can provide some beneficial inputs."

Shashank Kishore is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo