Suella Braverman is to stay in her put up as house secretary after the prime minister mentioned "further investigation is not necessary" into her dealing with of a dashing offence.

In his letter to the house secretary, the prime minister mentioned he had consulted along with his impartial ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, who suggested that "on this occasion further investigation is not necessary and I have accepted that advice".

Mr Sunak had been dealing with strain to take motion towards Ms Braverman after the Sunday Times reported that she allegedly requested civil servants to rearrange a non-public one-to-one course after she was caught dashing final summer time - a transfer critics mentioned might quantity to a breach of the ministerial code.

But Mr Sunak mentioned that after receiving a letter from Ms Braverman - wherein she apologised for inflicting "distraction" - "my decision is that these matters do not amount to a breach of the ministerial code".

In the change of letters, the house secretary admitted that "if faced with a similar situation again, I would have chosen a different course of action".

She mentioned she had "at all times been truthful and transparent, and taken decisions guided by what I believed was right and appropriate given my office, not by any personal motivation".

The Sunday Times reported that as a substitute of signing up for an in-person pace consciousness course with different motorists, or finishing one on-line that will present her identify and face to different members, Ms Braverman allegedly requested civil servants to rearrange a non-public one-to-one course.

When the civil servants refused, she reportedly sought assist from a political aide, who requested for the course organiser to offer a non-public session, or permit her to make use of an alias or flip her digicam off.

When the course supplier refused, Ms Braverman opted to take the three factors on her licence, the paper reported.

Ms Braverman mentioned she "sought to explore whether bespoke arrangements were possible" on account of her "personal circumstances" and the safety she receives as a authorities minister.

"I recognise how some people have construed this as me seeking to avoid sanction - at no point was that the intention or outcome," she mentioned.

"Nonetheless, given the fundamental importance of integrity in public life, I deeply regret that my actions may have given rise to that perception, and I apologise for the distraction this has caused."

Mr Sunak instantly got here beneath criticism for his determination, which the Liberal Democrats branded a "cowardly cop-out".

The get together's chief whip, Wendy Chamberlain, mentioned "with every scandal, we see the prime minister dither, delay and flip-flop - never taking decisive action".

"This is not the leadership the country needs during such a severe cost-of-living crisis. Sunak is too weak to even order an investigation, let alone sack his home secretary.

"Sunak had the possibility to do the suitable factor however as a substitute he is as soon as once more chosen to be dominated by his personal hardline backbenchers. He could also be in workplace however he's barely in energy."