The US Department of Justice is suing Apple, accusing the tech large of sustaining an unlawful monopoly on smartphones.

The 88-page lawsuit alleges the California-based firm is making its merchandise worse for shoppers so it may possibly block out rivals.

Attorney General Merrick Garland described the agency's behaviour as "exclusionary, anti-competitive conduct that hurts both consumers and developers".

Mr Garland stated: "Monopolies like Apple's threaten the free and fair markets upon which our economy is based.

"They stifle innovation, they damage producers and employees, they usually improve prices for shoppers.

"If left unchallenged, Apple will solely proceed to strengthen its smartphone monopoly."

According to the justice division, Apple's web earnings exceeds the person GDP of greater than 100 international locations and it attributes a big a part of that to the success of the iPhone.

Apple's share of the US smartphone market is greater than 65%.

Fifteen US states and the District of Columbia have joined the justice division within the first main antitrust effort towards the iPhone maker by the Biden administration.

What are the accusations based mostly on?

The lawsuit cites 5 examples of Apple suppressing applied sciences that might have elevated competitors - so-called "super apps", cloud stream sport apps, messaging apps, smartwatches and digital wallets.

Speaking concerning the digital pockets, Mr Garland stated Apple encourages banks to take part however on the similar time "exerts its monopoly power" to dam them from growing related merchandise for iPhone customers.

Click to subscribe to The Ian King Business Podcast wherever you get your podcasts

Apple has blocked third-party builders from creating digital wallets on the iPhone that use "tap-to-pay", as a substitute forcing customers to share private data with Apple as a substitute of simply their financial institution, he stated.

"When an iPhone user puts a credit or debit card into Apple Wallet, Apple inserts itself in a process that could otherwise occur directly between the user and card issuer," he added.

"This introduces an additional potential point of failure for the privacy and security of Apple users.

"And that is only one means wherein Apple is prepared to make the iPhone much less safe and fewer personal with a purpose to keep its monopoly energy."

Read extra:Apple fined £1.5bn for not notifying users of cheaper music streaming optionsOwned an older iPhone? You may get payout from UK lawsuit

Talking concerning the messaging app, Mr Garland stated that, if an iPhone person messages a non-iPhone person by means of Apple Messages, the textual content is simply a inexperienced bubble, it isn't encrypted, movies are pixelated, and customers can not edit messages or see typing indicators.

"As a result, iPhone users perceive rival smartphones as being lower quality because the experience of messaging friends and family who do not own iPhones is worse - even though Apple is the one responsible for breaking cross-platform messaging," Mr Garland stated.

"And it does so intentionally."

Keep up with all the newest news from the UK and world wide by following Sky News

Tap here

What has Apple stated?

Apple stated the lawsuit is "wrong on the facts and the law" and that it's going to vigorously defend towards it.

"This lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets.

"If profitable, it might hinder our means to create the type of know-how folks count on from Apple - the place {hardware} software program, and providers intersect."

Apple shares have been down 3.5% in US morning buying and selling.

Apple can be within the firing line in Europe the place, together with Meta and Alphabet's Google, it's anticipated to face the scrutiny of the European Commission.

The fee is prone to announce investigations within the coming days into whether or not the businesses have breached Europe's Digital Markets Act, Reuters reported.