Banks have been accused of placing the nation’s safety in danger by refusing to do enterprise with Britain’s defence trade.

The Ministry of Defence has launched a probe after dozens of navy corporations “large and small” complained they have been denied banking providers due to the character of their work.

Experts warn the pattern might see very important defence corporations collapse, leaving the nation reliant on international companies and “dramatically reducing national security”.

The development of environmental, social and ­governance insurance policies, which encourage companies to take a position “ethically”, has been blamed.

But the way in which they're being ­carried out has been branded “woke nonsense”.

The insurance policies are designed to guard monetary service companies from accusations of damaging the atmosphere or exploiting employees.

But Labour MP Kevan Jones, who sits on the defence choose committee, mentioned: “I’m sure these bankers will be more than happy to read out their codes of ethics to Russian forces as they land on our beaches.”

The MoD probe was launched days after the Treasury ordered its personal inquiry into claims that banks are closing prospects’ accounts as a result of they didn't like their views on controversial points.

Bosses of small defence companies declare they've been refused accounts, had their current accounts closed down, been refused insurance coverage or denied capital loans.

Former UKIP chief Nigel Farage mentioned his account had been closed due to his function delivering Brexit. It was later claimed that personal “royal bank” Coutts made the transfer as a result of he fell under its wealth threshold, however Mr Farage maintains politics is guilty.

The defence, safety and aerospace sector employs 417,000 individuals and gives very important gear to the Armed Forces.

An trade insider mentioned: “Defence is the new tobacco as far as banks are concerned. It’s seen as a dirty word but they are putting firms at risk due to this woke nonsense.”

Defence Minister James Cartlidge has confirmed the MoD is investigating and warned that the trade is required to maintain the nation secure.

He mentioned: “Russia’s ­invasion has highlighted why we must advocate for a strong defence industry, without which we could not have supplied Ukraine with the means to defend its freedom.

“Defence businesses large and small have told me that ESG rules have undermined them, from facing more expensive finance to being denied basic banking facilities.

“We are currently investigating the extent of this challenge but I am clear that a strong defence industry supports well-paid jobs around the UK, and enables our Armed Forces to keep us safe.”

Mr Cartlidge is in talks with ADS, the commerce physique representing 1,200 companies within the aerospace, safety, defence and area sectors, to debate how the Govern­­ment can finish the apply.

Smaller defence companies have been refused accounts, or instructed current accounts shall be closed and their stability refunded. They have additionally been refused insurance coverage, whereas bigger companies battle to lift capital.

Research from ADS discovered the proportion of funding funds that exclude the defence sector on moral grounds has risen from 59 per cent in 2021 to 91 per cent this 12 months.

An ADS spokesperson mentioned: “The aerospace and defence sectors have already seen reduced access to investment and financial services, due to investor concerns about ESG performance or other reputational risks.

“Our small and medium-sized enterprises are facing unprecedented barriers in accessing the finance they need.

“This can range from high-value investment rounds, down to difficulties faced accessing basic business banking services due to overzealous interpretation of risks from banks.

“For many funds, defence stocks have overtaken tobacco as less desirable, despite the vital role defence plays.”

Today the CEO of 1 £50million defence and safety agency instructed how that they had struggled to search out banking when their enterprise grew.

They mentioned: “We’d been with one bank, HSBC, from the beginning. But we have expanded and decided to see whether other banks could service us better or allow us to put our eggs in more than one basket.

“My treasurer, an ex-investment banker, wrote to 50 banks. Only Barclays and NatWest said they’d be happy to have a chat.

“The other 48 said they weren’t even interested in having a conversation. It’s obvious to me that the reason is that we inhabit the security and defence sector.”

Labour Shadow Defence Minister Chris Evans demanded a rethink by banks, saying: “Banks are in enough trouble at the moment – the last thing they should be doing is putting the ­successful defence industry at a disadvantage by refusing to work with them.

“The industry is at the cutting edge of technology and provides thousands of high-quality jobs. The banks need to pull their ­fingers out and start supporting them.”

Tina McKenzie, coverage chair on the Federation of Small Businesses, mentioned: “Excluding small defence firms from access to finance is surely not a desired outcome of good-faith ethical policies.”

Professor John Bryson, of Birmingham University, mentioned: “If the sector is undermined, the Government would be reliant on defence products produced by firms located in very unregulated countries.”

A spokesperson for UK Finance, the commerce physique for monetary service suppliers, mentioned: “Banks consider a number of factors in deciding whether to provide services to ­companies in the defence sector.

“These include ensuring compliance with any applicable laws and regulations, as well as a firm’s own risk management.

“Various firms have statements on their websites setting out their approach in terms of the defence sector, including what levels of due diligence are required.”