Yousaf: UK Government-ordered ban on glass in deposit return can be ‘outrage’
I
t can be a “democratic outrage” if the UK Government guidelines glass have to be excluded from Scotland’s deposit return scheme (DRS), the First Minister has mentioned.
Speculation is mounting that UK ministers will solely enable the environmental initiative to proceed north of the border if glass bottles are faraway from its remit.
That is regardless of Holyrood passing rules which imply glass bottles, in addition to plastic bottles and drinks cans, are included in deposit return.
Humza Yousaf instructed STV: “If press reports are true and they are going to unilaterally demand that glass is removed from the scheme, even though the Scottish Parliament passed regulations to include glass in the scheme, then to me that is a democratic outrage.”
Lorna Slater, the Green minister accountable for introducing DRS in Scotland, declared such a transfer would “ride roughshod over the devolution settlement”, whereas environmental campaigners insisted the elimination of glass would quantity to “sabotage” by the UK Government.
Mr Yousaf mentioned the UK Government had briefed the media on its plans “as opposed to writing to the Scottish Government”, insisting this can be a “further demonstration of the contempt they hold devolution in”, and a part of a “systematic pattern of behaviour from the UK Government to do what they can to undermine devolution”.
His feedback got here as ministers in London are contemplating if the Scottish DRS may be exempted from the UK Internal Market Act – laws introduced in after Brexit to make sure clean commerce between the 4 nations of the UK.
Scotland is because of implement DRS in March subsequent yr, forward of the remainder of the UK the next yr, and the scheme has been seen by some as a attainable barrier to commerce.
Glass bottles are usually not included in DRS schemes deliberate in England and Northern Ireland.
Noting that ministers at Holyrood haven’t but been knowledgeable of any resolution, Ms Slater accused the Tory UK Government of “treating the Scottish Parliament with contempt”.
She added: “An 11th hour decision from the UK Government to unilaterally remove glass from Scotland’s deposit return scheme… would ride roughshod over the devolution settlement, undermine our efforts to protect our environment and reduce climate emissions.”
Ms Slater mentioned the Scottish Government can “see no justification” for such a transfer, saying it might “undermine” UK local weather targets.
All however six of the 51 deposit return schemes working elsewhere on the planet embody glass, the Scottish Government mentioned – including that forcing Scotland to take away it from its scheme would imply recycling charges for glass bottles stay at an “unacceptable” 63%.
Ms Slater added: “If this decision turns out as reported, many of these bottles would unnecessarily end up as broken glass on our streets, our parks and our beaches.”
She mentioned the Scottish Government stays “committed to the delivery of a successful deposit return scheme” – however burdened it is going to “need to fully consider the implications for the successful delivery of the scheme”.
She vowed to provide an replace to MSPs as quickly as attainable.
Meanwhile, the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland, which has led the marketing campaign to introduce DRS, mentioned eradicating glass from it might be a “Westminster attempt to put a spanner in the works” of the initiative.
Director Kat Jones mentioned such a transfer “should send a chill down the spine of anyone hoping for environmental progress through devolution”.
She added: “Removing glass from the Scottish system would leave a costly and dangerous burden on councils, climate and our countryside.
“We remain confident that the Scottish Government can make this work, given the importance of what remains.
“But this would be an attempt at sabotage, nothing more, nothing less.”